This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 02:08, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Drastically improve or Delete. I'm a real inclusionist, but wouldn't this be better in the wiktionary, unless one can really write an article about it? As it is, it's pretty lame. Zantastik 06:58, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Transwiki to wiktionary. Slang term. Mgm|(talk) 12:46, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
Comment: This was apparently never listed on vfd, so I'm putting it on today's page. —Korath (Talk) 00:00, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
transwiki to wiktionary. Bubamara 04:46, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not a word. RickK 21:54, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
This is not worth transwikification. None of this content will be of use to Wiktionary. Wiktionary handles mis-spellings (that satisfy the inclusion criteria) like this: Wiktionary:damb. Delete. Uncle G 00:52, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
Comment: If a misspelling has a different meaning/usage, wiktionary should cover it. Kappa 04:17, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I don't see the relevance of that comment here. Uncle G 07:05, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)
Delete nothing here worth the transwiki Fawcett5 06:22, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.